Grammar and argument matter
Words gain meaning from sentences, paragraphs, and the writer's developing argument. A possible dictionary definition is not automatically the meaning in a particular passage.
We seek the literal sense through the text's words, grammar, genre, literary setting, historical world, and place in the whole canon, under the illumination of the Holy Spirit, so that sound doctrine leads to faithful life today.
The literal sense is the meaning a biblical text communicates through the human author's words as superintended by the Holy Spirit. It asks what those words mean in their grammar, literary form, historical and cultural setting, and unfolding argument. If the writer uses a metaphor, the literal sense is the meaning of the metaphor. If the writer gives a parable, poem, vision, symbol, historical narrative, or tightly reasoned letter, the literal sense respects that chosen form.
Because God is the divine Author of the whole canon, later Scripture may reveal patterns, fulfillments, and implications that an earlier writer did not exhaustively see. Later revelation deepens the earlier text without making its original wording or setting disposable.
Read in context: Nehemiah 8:7–8 ; Luke 24:25–27, 44–49 ; John 10:6–9 ; 2 Timothy 2:15 ; 3:14–17 ; 1 Peter 1:10–12 ; 2 Peter 1:19–21
A verse is never less than its wording, but it is always more than an isolated sentence. Each larger context helps us hear the same words more faithfully.
Read in context: Nehemiah 8:7–8 ; Luke 24:25–27, 44–49 ; Acts 17:10–12 ; 2 Timothy 2:15 ; 3:14–17 ; 2 Peter 1:19–21
The reader listens carefully to the form and world of the text before drawing a doctrinal conclusion or contemporary application.
Words gain meaning from sentences, paragraphs, and the writer's developing argument. A possible dictionary definition is not automatically the meaning in a particular passage.
Poetry uses imagery, parables teach through stories, prophecy may use symbolic visions, and letters develop arguments. Faithful reading does not flatten them into the same kind of speech.
Scripture came through real authors to real audiences within ancient Israel, Second Temple Judaism, and the Greco-Roman world. Their language and circumstances discipline our modern assumptions.
A passage retains its own context while also belonging to Scripture's unified testimony. Clearer and later passages can develop, fulfill, and clarify earlier patterns without erasing them.
Customs, institutions, geography, material culture, ancient languages, and the beliefs of neighboring peoples can help us hear what an ancient audience likely heard. They become dangerous when an interesting parallel is treated as proof or when a reconstruction is allowed to overrule the passage.
It does not insist that every image is a physical description, treat poetry as technical prose, ignore idioms and hyperbole, or read every vision as a photograph. It does not force the assumptions of a modern Western reader onto an ancient author. It also does not give an interpreter permission to invent hidden meanings that cannot be demonstrated from the words, genre, context, or wider canon.
Recognizing a figure of speech or symbolic form is not a retreat from literal meaning. It is necessary for receiving the meaning actually communicated.
Biblical narratives report and arrange events to reveal God's action and the human response. We attend to setting, plot, characterization, and the narrator's stated purpose.
Rivers can clap, mountains can skip, and wisdom sayings can address different situations. The imagery and poetic structure carry the meaning rather than defeating it.
Jesus is not a wooden door or botanical vine. The text signals metaphors and parables, and their literal sense is the truth communicated through those figures.
Visions use beasts, horns, lampstands, numbers, and cosmic imagery. We begin with explanations inside the passage and with earlier Scripture before importing modern headlines.
Scripture itself identifies people, events, and institutions that foreshadow later fulfillment. Galatians also gives an explicit allegorical use. These examples authorize careful canonical reading, not uncontrolled symbolism.
A sentence in an epistle belongs to a developing pastoral and theological argument. Repeated words, connectors, questions, contrasts, and conclusions help establish its meaning.
No method makes an interpreter infallible or free from assumptions. This is the safest starting discipline because the proposed meaning must be shown from evidence another reader can examine. It limits both institutional control and private imagination by requiring the interpreter to account for the actual wording, the original setting, the literary form, and the whole biblical witness.
Read in context: Luke 10:26 ; Acts 17:10–12 ; 2 Corinthians 4:1–6 ; 2 Timothy 2:14–19 ; 3:14–17 ; 2 Peter 3:14–18
God is omniscient and omnipotent. He gave Scripture through real people in ancient settings while fully knowing the generations who would later receive it. The original audience anchors the meaning, but God's purpose is not confined to that audience. Scripture explicitly says earlier words and events were preserved for the instruction, hope, correction, and formation of later believers.
Read in context: Psalm 102:18 ; Isaiah 46:9–10 ; Romans 4:23–24 ; 15:4 ; 1 Corinthians 9:9–10 ; 10:6, 11 ; 2 Timothy 3:14–17 ; John 17:20
Establish what the words communicate within their grammar, genre, argument, historical circumstances, and original audience. Application should not reverse or bypass this work.
Follow covenants, promises, patterns, and themes across the unfolding history of redemption, allowing later Scripture and the coming of Christ to clarify their development.
Ask what all relevant passages coherently teach about God, creation, humanity, Christ, the Holy Spirit, salvation, the church, and the last things. Doctrine should summarize Scripture, not govern it from outside.
Move from established meaning and sound doctrine to present belief, repentance, worship, ethics, relationships, mission, and hope. The goal is not information alone but faithful discipleship.
The Spirit of Truth inspired the prophetic and apostolic Word, opens minds to understand it, glorifies Christ, and enables believers to receive spiritual truth. His illumination is indispensable, but it is not permission to detach a verse from its context or make a private impression equal to revelation.
We pray for understanding, study carefully, compare Scripture with Scripture, receive correction, consult faithful teachers, and test every proposed insight. The Spirit who authored the Word does not lead us to deny what the Word actually says.
Read in context: Psalm 119:18 ; Luke 24:44–49 ; John 14:26 ; 16:13–15 ; 1 Corinthians 2:10–16 ; Ephesians 1:15–18 ; 1 John 4:1–6
These sources differ on some theological questions, but each contributes to a responsible account of grammar, genre, historical context, literary form, or canonical reading.
Scholarship serves careful reading. It does not replace the authority of Scripture or the illumination of the Holy Spirit.