How we read Scripture

Read the text as it was given.

We seek the literal sense through the text's words, grammar, genre, literary setting, historical world, and place in the whole canon, under the illumination of the Holy Spirit, so that sound doctrine leads to faithful life today.

Our working definition

Literal does not mean literalistic.

The literal sense is the meaning a biblical text communicates through the human author's words as superintended by the Holy Spirit. It asks what those words mean in their grammar, literary form, historical and cultural setting, and unfolding argument. If the writer uses a metaphor, the literal sense is the meaning of the metaphor. If the writer gives a parable, poem, vision, symbol, historical narrative, or tightly reasoned letter, the literal sense respects that chosen form.

Because God is the divine Author of the whole canon, later Scripture may reveal patterns, fulfillments, and implications that an earlier writer did not exhaustively see. Later revelation deepens the earlier text without making its original wording or setting disposable.

Read in context: Nehemiah 8:7–8 ; Luke 24:25–27, 44–49 ; John 10:6–9 ; 2 Timothy 2:15 ; 3:14–17 ; 1 Peter 1:10–12 ; 2 Peter 1:19–21

Diagram and visual guide

Understanding grows as the circle of context widens.

A verse is never less than its wording, but it is always more than an isolated sentence. Each larger context helps us hear the same words more faithfully.

1
VerseAttend to the actual words and grammar.
2
ParagraphFind the complete thought and its connections.
3
ChapterFollow the local development of the argument or narrative.
4
BookHear the author's purpose, themes, audience, and structure.
5
Whole ScriptureTrace how the canon reiterates, develops, fulfills, and qualifies the claim.
The TeacherThe Holy Spirit illumines the Word He inspired.He opens our understanding without bypassing grammar, genre, history, or the whole counsel of God.
What the picture helps us see:Context does not move us away from the verse. It protects the verse from being made to carry a meaning its inspired setting will not bear.

Read in context: Nehemiah 8:7–8 ; Luke 24:25–27, 44–49 ; Acts 17:10–12 ; 2 Timothy 2:15 ; 3:14–17 ; 2 Peter 1:19–21

Four controls

Meaning is discovered, not assigned.

The reader listens carefully to the form and world of the text before drawing a doctrinal conclusion or contemporary application.

Historical and cultural context

Use background as light, not as a lever.

Customs, institutions, geography, material culture, ancient languages, and the beliefs of neighboring peoples can help us hear what an ancient audience likely heard. They become dangerous when an interesting parallel is treated as proof or when a reconstruction is allowed to overrule the passage.

Begin with the passageBackground answers questions raised by the words, setting, or argument. It does not replace close reading.
Prefer primary evidenceUse inscriptions, documents, archaeology, and ancient literature through qualified specialists whenever possible.
State the confidence levelDistinguish what is well documented, what has strong support, and what remains debated or incomplete.
Do not confuse similarity with dependenceA parallel can clarify a shared world without proving that one text copied another or carries the same meaning.
Our rule: historical context may illuminate what the text could responsibly mean, but it may not make the text say what its words, argument, genre, and canonical setting will not bear. Read in context: Luke 1:1–4 ; Acts 17:22–31 ; 1 Corinthians 8:1–13 ; Colossians 2:6–23 ; Revelation 1:4, 9–11 .
What we reject

A literal-sense reading is not wooden literalism.

It does not insist that every image is a physical description, treat poetry as technical prose, ignore idioms and hyperbole, or read every vision as a photograph. It does not force the assumptions of a modern Western reader onto an ancient author. It also does not give an interpreter permission to invent hidden meanings that cannot be demonstrated from the words, genre, context, or wider canon.

Follow the context:
  1. word within sentence
  2. sentence within paragraph
  3. paragraph within book
  4. book within the whole of Scripture
Genre in practice

The literal sense follows the kind of writing God chose.

Recognizing a figure of speech or symbolic form is not a retreat from literal meaning. It is necessary for receiving the meaning actually communicated.

Narrative

Events told with theological purpose

Biblical narratives report and arrange events to reveal God's action and the human response. We attend to setting, plot, characterization, and the narrator's stated purpose.

Poetry and wisdom

Images, parallelism, and compressed truth

Rivers can clap, mountains can skip, and wisdom sayings can address different situations. The imagery and poetic structure carry the meaning rather than defeating it.

Metaphor and parable

Figurative speech communicates real truth

Jesus is not a wooden door or botanical vine. The text signals metaphors and parables, and their literal sense is the truth communicated through those figures.

Why this is safest

It keeps interpretation public, accountable, and correctable.

No method makes an interpreter infallible or free from assumptions. This is the safest starting discipline because the proposed meaning must be shown from evidence another reader can examine. It limits both institutional control and private imagination by requiring the interpreter to account for the actual wording, the original setting, the literary form, and the whole biblical witness.

Text-boundThe text may correct the reader instead of merely echoing the reader's preferences.
Context-awareThe ancient author and audience are heard before a modern application is made.
Canon-awareOne isolated verse cannot be made to silence Scripture's fuller testimony.
Open to examinationClaims, assumptions, and inferences can be tested rather than protected by authority.

Read in context: Luke 10:26 ; Acts 17:10–12 ; 2 Corinthians 4:1–6 ; 2 Timothy 2:14–19 ; 3:14–17 ; 2 Peter 3:14–18

Ancient word, present discipleship

The original meaning is the foundation, not the final stopping point.

God is omniscient and omnipotent. He gave Scripture through real people in ancient settings while fully knowing the generations who would later receive it. The original audience anchors the meaning, but God's purpose is not confined to that audience. Scripture explicitly says earlier words and events were preserved for the instruction, hope, correction, and formation of later believers.

Read in context: Psalm 102:18 ; Isaiah 46:9–10 ; Romans 4:23–24 ; 15:4 ; 1 Corinthians 9:9–10 ; 10:6, 11 ; 2 Timothy 3:14–17 ; John 17:20

1 · Exegesis

Hear the passage in its own context

Establish what the words communicate within their grammar, genre, argument, historical circumstances, and original audience. Application should not reverse or bypass this work.

The governing order: present application may extend the text's significance, but it may not contradict the text's meaning. Systematic theology gathers the whole witness of Scripture so that one passage is not isolated from everything else God has revealed.
The Teacher and the text

The Holy Spirit illumines Scripture without contradicting Scripture.

The Spirit of Truth inspired the prophetic and apostolic Word, opens minds to understand it, glorifies Christ, and enables believers to receive spiritual truth. His illumination is indispensable, but it is not permission to detach a verse from its context or make a private impression equal to revelation.

We pray for understanding, study carefully, compare Scripture with Scripture, receive correction, consult faithful teachers, and test every proposed insight. The Spirit who authored the Word does not lead us to deny what the Word actually says.

Read in context: Psalm 119:18 ; Luke 24:44–49 ; John 14:26 ; 16:13–15 ; 1 Corinthians 2:10–16 ; Ephesians 1:15–18 ; 1 John 4:1–6

A repeatable process

Eight questions guide every study.

  1. What kind of writing is this?
  2. Where does the complete thought begin and end?
  3. What do the grammar, repeated words, and connecting terms establish?
  4. What historical and cultural details would the first audience have known?
  5. What does the writer explicitly state, and where does our inference begin?
  6. How does the claim fit the argument of the book?
  7. Where does the wider canon reiterate, develop, qualify, or fulfill it?
  8. How does the passage lead us to know, trust, obey, or worship Christ?
Scholarship consulted

Established support for this reading discipline

These sources differ on some theological questions, but each contributes to a responsible account of grammar, genre, historical context, literary form, or canonical reading.